Legal Philosophy – Death Penalty: Retributivist v Utilitarian Theories
Death Penalty: Retributivist v. Utilitarian Theories
In this assignment, imagine that your state legislature is considering repealing its death penalty and the legislators wish to hear the opinions of the top legal philosophers on both sides of the death penalty debate.
Imagine yourself as a modern-day Jeremy Bentham and present three utilitarian arguments against the death penalty and therefore in favor of its repeal, citing sources to support your arguments. Then, step into the shoes of a modern-day Immanuel Kant and present to the legislature three retributivist arguments in favor of the death penalty and therefore, in opposition to its repeal, citing sources to support your arguments.
For each side of the debate, present each argument in detail, using headings and subheadings to keep your paper well-organized so that it will serve as a useful resource for your state legislators to be able to clearly grasp the key arguments on both sides.
Following your presentation of each side of the debate, the state legislators would like to hear your assessment of which theory of punishment, utilitarian or retributivist, you find most persuasive. Compare the persuasiveness of the two theories and provide a recommendation of which theory the legislators should follow (utilitarian for repeal of the state’s death penalty or retributivist for retention of the state’s death penalty).
Supplement your discussion with material from at least two sources other than the textbook. Be sure to cite your sources in APA format, using in-text citations and references.
Requirements: 750-1000 words