A control group is employed in scientific studies to ascertain an independent variable’s influence on the dependent one and prove a cause-and-effect link.
In the treatment group, the independent variable is manipulated, whereas, in the control group, the independent variable remains unchanged. The observations of these groups are then analyzed and compared to conclude.
Any change displayed by the dependent variable may be ascribed to the independent variable when using a control group in an experimental study.
It becomes essential to use control groups in an experimental setup. When researchers want to understand how a new treatment is influencing individuals, they split them into at least two groups randomly:
The treatment is an independent variable that the researchers modify, and the specific form of the treatment depends on the kind of research being conducted. For example, it might be a novel medicine or treatment in a medical study. In public policy research, it might be a new social policy that some people get but not others.
All factors other than the treatment should be held constant among the two groups in a well-designed experiment. It implies that researchers can accurately understand the effect of the treatment without worrying about confounding variables’ influence on the outcome.
You want to know if college students do better in school if compensated for their efforts. So you split a set of students into control and treatment groups to test this.
You may determine if monetary incentives boost school performance by comparing the average change in their grades over a year.
There may be more than one treatment or control group in a study. For example, researchers may wish to look at the effects of several treatments simultaneously or compare a novel treatment to several existing options.
You’ve created a brand-new blood pressure medication. You experiment with treatment and two control groups to see how successful it is.
Because the only variable that changes between the three groups is the type of tablet, they got. So any variations in average blood pressure may be attributed to the variety of pills.
Control groups are more commonly employed in experimental research, although they can also be utilized in other studies. Non-experimental control groups are used by researchers in two types of studies: quasi-experimental and matching designs.
While actual studies employ randomization to allocate participants to treatment or control groups, quasi-experimental designs use different criteria to assign individuals.
These allocations are frequently pre-existing groups that have received various treatments rather than controlled by researchers. Researchers may, for example, look at the consequences of a new teaching style that was introduced in particular classes but not others in a school or the influence of a new policy that was enacted in one region but not in another.
The control group in these circumstances is made up of classes that did not employ the new teaching technique or states that did not adopt the new policy.
When you can’t employ accurate or quasi-experimental methods in correlational research, matching might be a viable alternative.
Individuals, who got the “treatment,” or independent variable under investigation, are matched to those who did not–the control group–in matching designs.
Each participant of the treatment group has a control group equivalent which is similar to them in every manner outside of the therapy. It assures that the therapy is the sole factor influencing the result disparities between the two groups.
Example of a matched control group You’re curious if using electronic cigarettes might lead to lung cancer. The “treatment” here is to determine if someone has smoked electronic cigarettes. Unfortunately, you can’t just compare cancer rates between people who smoke e-cigarettes and those who don’t. The two groups are likely to be different in ways that impact cancer rates.
Rather, you can create a control group by comparing non-smokers to smokers (the treatment group). The comparison can be on age, sex, nutrition, level of workout, and other factors. Ensure that these are the only difference between the two groups–and therefore, the only variable that might cause discrepancies in their lung cancer rates–is their smoking of e-cigarettes.
Control groups aid in ensuring the internal validity of your study. Over time, you may notice a change in your dependent variable in your treatment group. But, without a control group, it is impossible to determine if the intervention caused the change. It’s conceivable that the change is due to something else.
If you choose a control group similar to the treatment group in every other way, you establish that the therapy–the sole distinction between the two groups–must have prompted the change.
Individuals, for example, frequently recover from diseases or injuries over time, irrespective of whether or not they got appropriate care. As a result, without a control group, it’s impossible to tell if improvements in health issues result from the therapy or due to the natural passage of time.
Suppose the control group varies from the treatment group in areas that weren’t factored in. In that case, your findings may indicate the interaction of confounding factors rather than the influence of your independent variable.
While reviewing your e-cigarette study, you discovered you neglected to account for a family history of smoking habit, which presumably varies between your control and treatment groups because individuals whose parents smoke are more likely to start smoking.
Higher risks of cancer might occur among participants in your treatment group because those from a smoking household are more susceptible to second-hand smoke, a recognized cancer trigger. Still, you can’t say for sure whether this variation is related to e-cigarettes.
Reducing this risk
A few approaches can help you reduce the danger of erroneous control groups.
A treatment group which is more commonly called an experimental group gets the treatment whose impact researchers want to evaluate, while a control group does not get any treatment. In every other manner, these should be comparable.
A controlled experiment must always contain a control group that is not given the experimental treatment to study the effects of the independent variables on the dependent ones. A control group also helps control confounding variables that otherwise would have influenced the outcome.
The preparation of procedures to study a relationship among variables is known as experimental design.
Generally, a minimum of one control group is required to conduct experimental research.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more