AFE6014-B: Empirical Methods in Accounting and Finance

AFE6014-B: Empirical Methods in Accounting and Finance

 

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
AFE6014-B: Empirical Methods in Accounting and Finance
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

FoMLSS Accounting, Finance, and Economics

AFE6014-B: Empirical Methods in Accounting and Finance

 

Submission date: 22nd Jan 2021 at 3.00 pm [UK time]

 

TYPE OF ASSESSMENT: Individual Assessed Coursework

 

(3,000 words maximum excluding tables, figures, and references)

 

  • Failure to submit your coursework by this deadline will result in a mark of 0%
  • The assignment must be submitted in electronic format to the ‘Turnitin’ drop-box in the Canvas site for this module
  • You are advised to plan your work carefully and back-up your work. Computing problems will NOT be accepted as reasons for non-submission
  • Along with the main report, you also need to submit the original dataset and screenshots of results from SPSS or EViews

 

 

Individual Assessed Coursework Brief

Under the revised assessment requirements due to COVID-19, this module will be assessed via a written assessed coursework. This is an individual assignment containing seven different requirements. Along with the main report, you also need to submit the original dataset and screenshots of results from SPSS or EViews.

The written report should not exceed 3,000 words and should be submitted by 22nd Jan 2021 at 3.00 pm (UK time) via Turnitin. Excessive assignments will be penalised according to section 9.13 of Regulation 9 Regulation Governing Postgraduate Taught Awards: “Assessed work which exceeds a specified maximum permitted length will be subject to a penalty deduction of marks equivalent to the percentage of additional words over the limit. The limit excludes bibliographies, diagrams and tables, footnotes, tables of contents and appendices of data.”

 

Introduction

The mean-variance relationship has long been a focus in finance literature. Traditional financial theories propose a positive mean-variance relationship (Merton, 1973), i.e. bearing high (low) risk should be rewarded by high (low) returns, empirical studies document at best inconclusive evidence with three mainstreams due to different economic settings and volatility model selection. French et al. (1987), Scruggs (1998), Ghysels et al. (2005), Lundblad (2007), Pástor et al. (2008), Brandt and Wang (2010), and Rossi and Timmermann (2015), among others find the risk-return tradeoff despite being less significant in some cases. On the other hand, Nelson (1991), Brandt and Kang (2004), Baker et al. (2011), Fiore and Saha (2015), and Booth et al. (2016), among others, document a negative mean-variance relationship. Turner et al. (1989), Glosten et al. (1993), Sun et al. (2017), and Wang et al. (2017), among others, report both positive and negative relationship between risk and returns.

Behavior financial theories highlight investor sentiment in influencing stock prices, despite the traditional ones positing that stock prices are the discounted future cash flows and arbitrage leaves little space for investor sentiment (Fama, 1965). De Long et al. (1990) argue that sentiment investors trading together brings systematic risk into stock markets. The risk originated from the stochastic shifts in investor sentiment imposes arbitrage limits on rational investors, impeding them from trading against noise investors. As a result, the mispricing caused by sentiment investors is persistent. Baker and Wurgler (2006) state two routes whereby investor sentiment can cause persistent impact on stock prices: (i) uninformed demand shocks, and (ii) limits on arbitrage. Uninformed demand shocks naturally persist in that irrational investors’ misbeliefs could be further strengthened by others ‘joining on the bandwagon’ (Brown and Cliff, 2005, p. 407). Limits on arbitrage demotivate arbitrageurs from relieving the impact of investor sentiment since they are commonly subject to relatively restricted investment horizons and can hardly accurately forecast how the impact will persist. Therefore, one can observe that high levels of optimism (pessimism) would cause high (low) concurrent returns, and given the mean-reversion property, overpricing (underpricing) would be corrected and followed by low (high) subsequent returns.

Combining two streams of literature, Yu and Yuan (2011), by sampling the US stock market, evidence the risk-return tradeoff amid low-sentiment periods but not over high-sentiment periods.

In line with the above-mentioned points, please prepare a report with a specific emphasis on the following seven requirements:

 

Required:

  1. Discuss the theoretical underpinnings for empirical findings of Yu and Yuan (2011).                                              [6 marks]
  2. Suppose that you decide to extend the US evidence from Yu and Yuan (2011) to another market. Select a market and motivate your selection.                                              [8 marks]
  3. Critically review related literature, and summarise and evaluate approaches to construct proxies for investor sentiment.                                              [12 marks]
  4. Determine a proxy for investor sentiment in your selected market, and elaborate motivation for your selection.                                              [8 marks]
  5. Present descriptive statistics of (i) market returns of the selected market and (ii) investor sentiment.                                              [15 marks]
  6. Select one method to filter conditional volatility of market returns, and present descriptive statistics of conditional volatility.                                                                                                                                                                                                                   [15 marks]
  7. Examine (i) the relation between market returns and investor sentiment, and (ii) the relation between market returns and conditional volatility. Discuss potential limitations of your work.                                                                                           [36 marks]

 

While attempting requirements 1–7 you should follow academic writing style format relying on journal articles. Failing to do so will lead to a FAIL in this module.

 

Guideline coverage of issues/answers expectations:

Requirement 1:

  1. Provide theoretical underpinnings of the findings in Yu and Yuan (2011).

 

Requirement 2:

  1. Select a non-US market.
  2. Motivate your choice.

 

Requirement 3:

  1. Specific reasons why proxies are required for investor sentiment.
  2. Summarise main types proxies for investor sentiment
  3. Evaluate merits and drawbacks of each type.

 

Requirement 4:

  1. Select a proxy for investor sentiment.
  2. Motivate your selection.

 

Requirement 5:

  1. Present descriptive statistics of market returns of the selected market.
  2. Present descriptive statistics of investor sentiment.

 

Requirement 6:

  1. Select the method to filter conditional volatility.
  2. Motivate your selection.
  3. Present descriptive statistics of conditional volatility.

 

Requirement 7:

  1. Examine the relation between market returns and investor sentiment.
  2. Examine the relation between market returns and conditional volatility.
  3. Discuss limitations of your analysis.

 

Along with the main report, you also need to submit the original dataset and screenshots of results from SPSS or EViews.

Relevant References (You may use these references to help to produce your report)

Baker, M., Stein, J.C., 2004. Market liquidity as a sentiment indicator. Journal of Financial Markets 7 (3), 271−299.

Baker, M., Wurgler, J., 2006. Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns. Journal of Finance 61 (4), 1645−1680.

Baker, M., Wurgler, J., 2007. Investor sentiment in the stock market. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (2), 129−151.

Black, F., 1986. Noise. Journal of Finance 41 (3), 528–543.

Brown, G.W., 1999. Volatility, sentiment, and noise traders. Financial Analysts Journal 55 (2), 82−90.

Brown, G.W., Cliff, M.T., 2005. Investor sentiment and asset valuation. Journal of Business 78 (2), 405−440.

Campbell, J.Y., Hentschel, L. 1992. No news is good news: An asymmetric model of changing volatility in stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics 31 (3), 281–318.

Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D., Subrahmanyam, A., 1998. Investor psychology and security market under- and overreactions. Journal of Finance 53 (6), 1839−1886.

De Long, J.B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L.H., Waldmann, R.J., 1990. Noise trader risk in financial markets. Journal of Political Economy 98 (4), 703−738.

Engle, R.F., Ng, V.K., 1993. Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility. Journal of Finance 48 (5), 1749−1778.

Fama, E.F., 1965. The behavior of stock-market prices. Journal of Business 38 (1), 34−105.

French, K.R., Schwert, G.W., Stambaugh, R.F., 1987. Expected stock returns and volatility. Journal of Financial Economics 19 (1), 3−29.

Nofsinger, J., 2005. Social mood and financial economics. Journal of Behavioural Finance 6 (3), 144–160.

Ofek, E., Richardson, M., Whitelaw, R.F., 2004. Limited arbitrage and short sales restrictions: Evidence from the options markets. Journal of Financial Economics 74 (2), 305−342.

Pan, L., Tang, Y., Xu, J., 2016. Speculative trading and stock returns. Review of Finance 20 (5), 1835–1865.

Qiu, L., Welch, I., 2006. Investor sentiment measures. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Scheinkman, J.A., Xiong, W., 2009. Overconfidence and speculative bubbles. Journal of Political Economy 111 (6), 1183−1219.

Schmeling, M., 2009. Investor sentiment and stock returns: Some international evidence. Journal of Empirical Finance 16 (3), 394−408.

Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1997. The limits of arbitrage. Journal of Finance 52 (1), 35−55.

Tetlock, P.C., 2007. Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market. Journal of Finance 62 (3), 1139−1168.

Wang, W., 2018a. Investor sentiment and the mean-variance relationship: European evidence. Research in International Business and Finance 46, 227–239.

Wang, W., 2018b. The mean–variance relation and the role of institutional investor sentiment. Economics Letters 168, 61–64.

Wang, W., 2019. Institutional investor sentiment, beta, and stock returns. Finance Research Letters, in press.

Wang, Y.H., Keswani, A., Taylor, S.J., 2006. The relationships between sentiment, returns and volatility. International Journal of Forecasting 22 (1), 109−123.

Yu, J., Yuan, Y., 2011. Investor sentiment and the mean-variance relation. Journal of Financial Economics 100 (2), 367−381.

Yuan, Y., 2015. Market-wide attention, trading, and stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics 116 (3), 548–564.

 

– THE END OF THE PAPER –

 

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Home Work Stand
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Human Resources Management (HRM)
The best writer in his subject of expertise. It is reflected in the quality of the work.
Customer 452445, December 29th, 2021
Business Studies
Remarkable work!! Always helpful and amazing communication!!
Customer 452445, January 4th, 2022
Business Studies
Paper is great. Just only needed the one reference. Thank you
Customer 452445, June 14th, 2022
Criminal law
Great experience with this writer, my paper is always ready before my deadline and done professionally.
Customer 452445, January 28th, 2022
Business Studies
Great writer. Highly recommended!
Customer 452445, December 22nd, 2021
Nursing
Very professional and easy to work with. I highly recommend!
Customer 452445, December 12th, 2021
Business Studies
Needed a little editing. Anyway, thank you.
Customer 452445, October 31st, 2021
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Always amazing work! Easy communication and made changes according to my needs!!
Customer 452445, January 5th, 2022
Human Resources Management (HRM)
I am very pleased with your work and how it was completed in a timely manner. I will be requesting this writer for future assignments. Excellent work!
Customer 452445, June 10th, 2022
Psychology
You have done a fantastic job ???? thank you.????
Customer 452445, January 14th, 2022
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Great paper and delivered on time.
Customer 452445, January 27th, 2022
Classic English Literature
Awesome writer! Paper was perfect and I earned a perfect score!
Customer 452445, December 13th, 2021
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code ESSAYHELP